Storix, Inc. v. Anthony Johnson - A Case Study

Anthony Johnson has become the most abused pro se civil litigant in U.S. history. Don't be too quick to judge Anthony as another disgruntled losing party that simply won't accept his loss. The attorneys and their clients never stopped attacking him because no judge would even acknowledge what they were doing, much less allow a pro se litigant to stop them.

​In 2011, Anthony Johnson gifted a collective 52% stock in his company, Storix, Inc. to his 4 long-term employees after being diagnosed with terminal cancer. Remarkably, Johnson didn't die, and his former employees didn't like it. They wanted the rest of his stock, and used their new controlling interest in his company to sue him relentlessly for no reason. They cut off his remaining income, sued him for the copyrights to the software he designed and developed for 15 years, then sued him for allegedly "intending" to compete with his own company. Johnson counter-sued, first represented by a private attorney and eventually self-represented, but always opposed by multiple attorneys from two behemoth law firms being paid by his own company.

 

After 7 years and hundreds of pleadings in 4 California trial courts, the California Court of Appeals, and the Ninth Circuit (federal ) Court of Appeals, there was not a single decision in Johnson's favor. In the end, Johnson lost his entire company, the copyrights to his software, his home and savings, and every court further punished him for losing by ordering him to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in costs and attorney fees to both the company and his former employees. Not once would any of them acknowledge that his former employees were in total control of Storix and self-approved using company funds to sue him and for their defense in every action, thereby using Johnson's own 40% remaining share of Storix's profits to fund all the litigation against him.

Every decision against Johnson on every issue in 4 different cases was clearly against the law. Johnson proved every fact and supported every argument in his pleadings with indisputable statutes and case law, but the judges simply ignored anything that didn't support the position of the attorneys opposing him. They knew from the start that Johnson was financially disadvantaged, massively outgunned, and couldn't afford an attorney to appeal their decisions. They also knew the appellate courts rarely take a pro se appellant seriously and similarly ignore any fact or argument that would require their decisions to be overturned.


Judges rely on the fact that no one sees a case beyond what they include in their orders and opinions, so they simply re-wrote the facts and issues of the case to conform to their decisions. Anthony's efforts to draw the judge's attention even to millions of dollars of embezzlement and tax fraud occurring at his own company was futile, and he was instead punished repeatedly for trying to stop it.

The judges took Johnson's life's work, his entire company, his home and savings without addressing Johnson's defenses or the actual claims he brought to their courts. And all without the opposing attorneys or their clients having to dispute a single fact.

 

What's most extraordinary is that Johnson was never found to have done anything to harm anyone - except when "Storix" added a new claim of $3,739.14 agaisnt Johnson for allegely sending an email that caused a "loss of employee productivity," Storix's attorneys knew the jury was about to reject the ludicrous $1.25 million claim against him for "intending" to compete, so they raised this trivial claim for the first time in closing arguments when Johnson would have no chance to dispute it.

 

After trial, Johnson discovered that his former employees (Storix's 52% shareholders) had siphoned about $475,000 out of his company earnings when he was on medical leave in 2011 that they never expected him to return from. Finally understanding why they fought so hard to keep him out of the company and its financial records for years, Johnson brought a new lawsuit for that and about $5 million of other damages they'd caused him throughout the litigation. What three judges did to prevent those claims from being heard was unimaginable.  Based on nothing more than the trivial $3,739.14 judgment against him, they dismissed his new claims and then ordered him to pay another $200,000 in cost and attorney fees to the same defendants who'd already taken all his company income for 7 years.

Finally, Johnson brought a complaint against 4 judges and 5 attorneys for conspiring to deprive him his civil rights, even as one of the judges continues to stay one of several claims in a prior complaint (without explanation) to prevent him from appealing her other decisions. The newly assigned federal judge dismissed all claims against the judges, attorneys and their clients who took millions from Johnson, still without their having to deny a single fact. Any appeal must await a final decision on the single remaining claim, this time against Storix for the $475,000 of profits owed to him. It remains to be seen if it will ever make it to a jury, since it can't be decided without examining the same evidence of financial and litigation misconduct that every judge in the past has repeatedly punished Johnson for trying to expose.

Johnson is pro se but continues to fight for his civil rights. Judges can do almost anything to prevent his claims (especially those against themselves) from being heard on their merits, but they can't prevent him from shining a spotlight on their past (and continuing) violations of his constitutional right to due process.

 

The Storix v. Johnson Papers

​​The trial and appellate court's orders, judgments and opinions in Johnson's cases were either summary dispositions that say little to nothing about the issues raised, or appear thorough and well reasoned but actually focus on irrelevant issues (many the opposing attorneys didn't even argue), ignored the actual issues, and conflict with well-established law when the facts of the case are applied (which they never were).

Some of the judges' orders and all appellate rulings can be found on the web, but the parties' pleadings, motions, oppositions & replies underlying those decisions are rarely seen since they can only be obtained through a paid service. As such, anyone reading the decisions alone would never know the actual facts or issues the courts chose to ignore. 

Since all court filings are considered public information, they are provided here so you can see for yourself that all the relevant facts, issues and arguments provided by Johnson in dozens of pleadings, especially those involving attorney and judicial misconduct, are conspicuously absent from every ruling in both the trial and appellate courts.

The papers provided here include not only his appeals to the California and Ninth Circuit courts of appeal, but also his petitions to the California and U.S. Supreme Courts. To be sure, if Johnson couldn't get any court to review the atrocious decisions against him, he'd be sure as many people as possible at least saw how hard he tried.

 

Provided this background, rather than relying solely on the courts' orders and opinions, you can decide for yourself if Johnson was ever given a fair hearing. Pay special attention to the motions for reconsideration, new trial and rehearings that all asked the courts to simply decide the issues that were previously ignored, or to re-decide issues in light of relevant facts and law that were never acknowledged. Every motion was "summarily denied" without reference to the actual issues, ensuing once again that no one reading the orders were any wiser.