Storix v. Johnson | Cases & Documents

The following are the documents are separated by case, but note that dates (2014-2021) of some cases overlap. The last case is the civil rights case Johnson finally filed against the judges, attorneys and Storix's management for conspiring to deprive him his constitutional rights for over 6 years.

Note the several purposes for providing these documents:

  1. To prove the systematic abuse of judges at every level of the California state and federal judiciaries and the lengths they will go to conceal the clear bias and incompetence of the lower courts occupied by judges with absolute immunity and life terms in which there is no means to remove them.

  2. To demonstrate that Johnson was never unreasonable, his claims were never frivolous, and his facts and arguments were clear and undisputed but simply never acknowledged by the trial or appellate courts.

  3. To demonstrate that not one judge in 6 years acknowledged any of the litigation misconduct or conflict-of-interest of the multiple attorneys from Procopio (purportedly representing Storix) or Wilson/Elser (representing Storix's management - the 52% shareholders), or that they were all being illegally paid Johnson's own money to litigate against him in order to protect their absolute control of the company and conceal its financial records. The documents also show that the judges (including the court of appeals) forced Johnson to pay the unprecedented costs and attorney fees of both Storix and the 52% (who never paid any expenses) to deter and punish Johnson for trying to expose the millions of embezzlement of tax fraud of the defendants (including the attorneys).

  4. To prove that every decision against Johnson that collectively cost him and Storix over $7 million was based on nothing more than a $3,739.14 claim against him for sending an email in 2015 - which "Storix" raised as a new claim in closing arguments after a 10-day trial that Johnson had no opportunity to dispute.

  5. To prove that everything in the book "Summarily Denied" (soon to be released) is completely true and supported by the court's own documents

The documents HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW are the most relevant pleadings and appeal briefs in which Johnson brought to each court's attention both clear legal errors and the intentional omission of facts, issues and arguments in the orders, judgements and opinions - all of which they continued to ignore. The files HIGHLIGHTED IN GREEN are the most relevant orders and opinions of the courts showing that the most dispositive issues and arguments were never addressed.

 

  * Note that some of the documents contain comments added by Johnson as he prepared his responses and appeals,
     and some may contain insults or foul language, but were retained since they provide context as to the absurdity of
     the opposing arguments and the court's decisions.